向上流动还是边缘游走——自我雇佣对农村流动人口城市融入的影响  

Upward Mobility or Marginal Wandering:The Impact of Self-Employment on the Urban Integration of Rural Migrants

作　　者：林龙飞 陈传波[2] LIN Longfei;CHEN Chuanbo(Hubei Rural Development Research Center,Yangtze University,Jingzhou,434000;School of Agricultural and Rural Development,Renmin University of China,Beijing,100872)

机构地区：[1]长江大学湖北农村发展研究中心 [2]中国人民大学农业与农村发展学院

出　　处：《中国经济问题》2024年第5期135-147,共13页China Economic Studies

基　　金：教育部人文社科研究青年基金项目(23YJCZH126);湖北省教育厅哲学社会科学研究重点项目(23D049)。

摘　　要：推进农村流动人口城市融入是中国式现代化进程中的重要主题。文章利用流动人口动态监测数据和宏观城市数据的匹配数据,并辅以相关访谈资料,考察了自我雇佣对农村流动人口城市融入的影响及其作用机制。研究发现,自我雇佣群体内部分化明显,机会型自雇农村流动人口市场回报高,是城市融入的优势群体;而生存型自雇农村流动人口市场回报低,是城市融入的劣势群体。进一步机制分析表明,机会型自雇农村流动人口通过“住房效应”和“社会交往效应”影响其城市融入,即机会型自雇身份提升了农村流动人口在城市拥有自有住房和社会交往的概率,进而促使其更好地融入城市。未来推动规模日益庞大的自雇农村流动人口城市融入,需针对自雇农村流动人口内部异质分化的趋势,设计差别化的融入政策。This paper examines the impact of self-employment on the urban integration of the rural migrant population and its mechanism of action,utilizing matched data from dynamic monitoring of floating population and macro urban data.It is found that there is a clear differentiation within the self-employed group,with high market returns for opportunity-type self-employed rural migrants,which is an advantageous group for urban integration,and low market returns for survivaltype self-employed rural migrants,which is a disadvantageous group for urban integration.Further analysis of the mechanism shows that the advantageous self-employed rural migrants affect their urban integration through the“housing effect”and“social interaction effect”.In order to promote the urban integration of the growing number of self-employed rural migrants in the future,it is necessary to design differentiated integration policies to address the trend of heterogeneous differentiation within the self-employed rural migrant population.

关 键 词：中国式现代化 自我雇佣 农村流动人口 城市融入 

分 类 号：C924.2[社会学—人口学] F323.6F299.2