检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:廖优 LIAO You(Tongji University,Shanghai 200092,China)
出 处:《哈尔滨学院学报》2024年第12期16-20,共5页Journal of Harbin University
基 金:国家社会科学基金西部项目,项目编号:22XZX001。
摘 要:《马克思主义与哲学》成书一百年后仍可再回顾“柯尔施问题”(马克思主义与哲学的关系)。柯尔施认为第二国际理论家曲解了马克思19世纪40年代中后期文本中的“消灭哲学”,他将这种曲解视为当时马克思主义阵营缺乏革命性的重要理论原因。从整个理论发展史上看,“消灭哲学”只是强调积极扬弃以往的观念哲学,辩证法作为核心方法仍然贯穿于整个马克思主义发展史中。柯尔施的理论与卢卡奇将马克思主义解读为“革命的辩证法”共享同一背景与主题,但在理解上存在一定分歧,这正是柯尔施的独特理论贡献。A century after the publication of“Marxism and Philosophy”,we can still revisit the“Korsch Problem”(the relationship between Marxism and philosophy).Korsch believed that the theorists of the Second International misinterpreted Marx’s concept of“the abolition of philosophy”found in his texts from the mid 1840s.He viewed this misinterpretation as a significant theoretical reason for the lack of revolutionary spirit within the Marxist camp at that time.From the perspective of the entire history of theoretical development,“the abolition of philosophy”emphasizes the active overcoming of previous idealist philosophies,while dialectics as the core method has remained a consistent thread throughout the history of Marxism.Korsch’s theory shares the same background and themes with Lukács’interpretation of Marxism as“revolutionary dialectics,”but there are certain divergences in understanding,which constitute Korsch’s unique theoretical contribution.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.90