检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王猛[1] 王博琳 WANG Meng;WANG Bolin(International Business School,Shanxi Normal University,Xi an 710119,China)
出 处:《华中师范大学学报(自然科学版)》2024年第6期700-710,共11页Journal of Central China Normal University:Natural Sciences
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目(BFA220177).
摘 要:高铁能否促进地区间旅游业的包容性发展,这一问题缺乏实证研究.借助高铁开通的自然实验,该文考察高铁对旅游业的影响在不同经济水平、行政等级、公路和机场状况、旅游资源的地区间的差异.利用2003—2020年284个地级及以上行政区的面板数据,构造双重差分(DID)模型实施因果推断,发现高铁对旅游业的促进作用在经济水平落后、行政等级低、公路和机场状况差的地区更为强烈,在旅游资源不同的地区间无显著差异,该结论在此后的系列分析中保持稳健.上述结果表明高铁对促进弱势地区的旅游业发展更为有利,能实现地区间旅游业的包容性发展.该文研究结论为推动弱势地区的旅游业发展带来政策启示.There is a lack of empirical research on whether high-speed rail can promote inclusive development of inter-regional tourism.With the help of a natural experiment on the opening of high-speed rail,this study compares the impact of high-speed rail on tourism in the regions with different economic levels,administrative levels,highway and airport conditions,and tourism resources.Based on the panel data of 284 administrative regions at and above the prefecture level from 2003 to 2020,the difference-in-difference(DID)model is constructed to implement causal inference.It is found that the positive impact of high-speed rail on tourism is stronger in the areas with backward economic level,low administrative level,poor highway and airport conditions,while there is no significant difference among regions with different tourism resources,and these conclusions remain stable in a series of subsequent analyses.The above results show that high-speed rail is more beneficial to tourism in disadvantaged areas,and can achieve inclusive development of inter-regional tourism.The conclusions of this paper provide policy implications for promoting the development of tourism in disadvantaged areas.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38