检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:左文敏 Zuo Wenmin(Shangrao Tianjing Engineering Consulting Co.Ltd.,Shangrao,Jiangxi 334000)
机构地区:[1]上饶天景工程咨询有限公司,江西上饶334000
出 处:《江西建材》2024年第7期382-384,共3页
摘 要:文中依托某地下综合管廊工程实践,对施工工法优化前后城市地下综合管廊造价进行分析。结果表明,优化施工工法前,所有建筑结构的土建工程费用占比达到80%以上;城市地下综合管廊各项目中长度工程造价排序为盾构管廊B线>4舱管廊>盾构管廊A线>3舱管廊>2舱管廊;与优化前相比,优化后总工程费用降低了5.2%;对总降低费用贡献最大的为盾构管廊B线工程,所占比例为8.1%;对总降低费用贡献最小的为3舱管廊,所占比例为5.7%。Based on the engineering practice of an underground integrated pipe corridor,the paper analyzes the cost of urban underground integrated pipe corridor before and after the optimization of construction method.The results show that the proportion of civil engineering cost of all building structures before optimizing construction method is more than 80%.In each project of urban underground integrated pipe corridor,the length engineering cost is ranked as shield pipe corridor B>4-cabin pipe corridor>Shield pipe corridor A>3-cabin pipe corridor>2-cabin pipe corridor;Compared with before optimization,the total project cost after optimization is reduced by 5.2%.The largest contribution to the total cost reduction is the shield pipeline corridor B project,accounting for 8.1%;The smallest contribution to the total cost reduction was the three-compartment pipe gallery,which accounted for 5.7%.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.239