ChatGPT著作权主体的否定性分析  

Negative Analysis of ChatGPT's Copyright Subject

作　　者：郑雯婕 佴澎 陈翔瑞 任增菲 ZHENG Wenjie;NAI Peng;CHEN Xiangrui;REN Zengfei(School of Law and Political Science,Yunnan University of Finance and Economics,Kunming 650221,China;Students'Affairs Office,Yunnan Tourism Vocational College,Kunming 650221,China)

机构地区：[1]云南财经大学法政学院,云南昆明650221 [2]云南旅游职业学院学生处,云南昆明650221

出　　处：《昭通学院学报》2024年第4期70-75,共6页Journal of Zhaotong University

基　　金：云南省教育厅科学研究基金项目“企业合规第三方监管机制优化路径探析——基于试点适用情况的调研总结”(2024Y557)。

摘　　要：人工智能的热点效应引发了我国法学界的派生讨论,目前代表人工智能最新技术的ChatGPT势头大热,ChatGPT能够代替人类撰写论文、诗歌、新闻报道等,其自主生成的内容是否属于著作权法所保护的作品就是在著作权领域中的一大新议题。不少学者提出将其纳入著作权主体的范畴进行规范保护,但ChatGPT始终没有引发技术的革新性变动,也没有构成对法律主体制度的突破与颠覆,生成的内容不属于作品,也不需要赋予其著作权主体地位。The hot effect of artificial intelligence has triggered derivative discussions in the legal circle of our country.At present,ChatGPT,which represents the latest technology of artificial intelligence,is gaining momentum.ChatGPT can replace human beings to write articles,poems,news reports,etc.Whether its self-generated content belongs to the works protected by copyright law is a new issue in the field of copyright.Many scholars have proposed to include ChatGPT into the category of copyright subject for normative protection,but ChatGPT has not caused innovative changes in technology,nor has it constituted a breakthrough or subversion of the legal subject system.The generated content is not a work,and it does not need to be granted the status of copyright subject.

关 键 词：ChatGPT 生成内容 著作权 主体 

分 类 号：D922.17[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]