色情批判、语言批判与权力批判——论耶利内克《情欲》的色情书写  

Pornography criticism,language criticism and power criticism——On erotic writing in Elfriede Jelinek's Lust

作　　者：史敏岳 曾悦[1] SHI Minyue;ZENG Yue(School of Foreign Languages,Nanchang Hangkong University,Nanchang 330063,P.R.China)

机构地区：[1]南昌航空大学

出　　处：《外国语言文学》2024年第4期71-79,89,135,共11页Foreign Language and Literature Studies

摘　　要：2004年诺贝尔文学奖得主埃尔弗里德·耶利内克的小说《情欲》(1989)以其露骨的性描写和直接粗暴的语言使作家陷入丑闻。但色情书写只是小说进行社会批判的语言手段。实际上,《情欲》根植于20世纪80年代西方社会的反色情运动,通过对色情语言的夸张、嬉拟、讽刺,解构了作为男权社会产物的色情文学。耶利内克创造了一种后现代的色情语言,通过话语交融的隐喻式书写,将批判的矛头从色情产业延伸到了语言乃至整个资本主义社会文化。在罗兰·巴特的神话学意义上,《情欲》的色情书写通过审视语言和符号,揭示了资本主义权力关系在社会文化中的渗透。在消费主义盛行的现代社会,《情欲》的文化批判态度仍不失其当下的社会批判性。Elfriede Jelinek, the Nobel Prize Winner in Literature in 2004, has been engulfed in scandal by her novel Lust(1989) with its explicit sexual depictions and crude wordings. However, pornography is only a metaphorical means of social criticism. In fact, Lust is rooted in the anti-pornography movement in Western society in the 1980s and deconstructs pornography as a product of patriarchal society through exaggeration, parody and satire embedded in pornographic wordings. Jelinek creates a post-modern pornographic language, and through the metaphorical writing of discourse blending, her criticism extends from the pornographic industry to language and even the entire capitalistic social culture. In the mythological sense of Roland Barthes, Lust reveals the penetration of capitalist power relations in social culture by the language-oriented and symbol-loaded erotic writing. In the modern society where consumerism prevails, Lust still retains its contemporariness in cultural criticism.

关 键 词：耶利内克 《情欲》 色情书写 资本主义权力关系 文化批判 

分 类 号：I106[文学—世界文学]