论民事诉讼中律师调查令制度的实现路径  

The Realization Path of the Lawyer's Investigation Order System in Civil Litigation

作　　者：王凡 白佩君[2] Wang Fan;Bai Peijun

机构地区：[1]青海民族大学 [2]青海民族大学法学院

出　　处：《北京政法职业学院学报》2024年第4期68-73,共6页Journal of Beijing College of Politics and Law

基　　金：青海民族大学研究生创新项目“论民事诉讼中律师调查令制度的实现研究”的阶段性研究成果,项目编号:04M2023030。

摘　　要：我国现有当事人自行收集和法院依职权调查取证两种证据收集方式,随着实践的应用,弊端逐渐显露。在探寻一种新的证据收集方式时,律师调查令应时而生。从立法技术与司法应用来看,律师调查令早已具备入法的成熟条件。具体而言,从各省市司法实践探索中可以得出律师调查令现存基础内容规定欠缺、运作程序亟需规范性、协助义务人配合度不高和缺少必要惩戒措施的适用困境,并基于对适用困境的详尽论述,从律师调查令的法律地位、运作内容、罚则体系和信息联动机制方面做出路径建议,以期在理论基础上对这项制度的完善提供研究思路。Currently,there are two methods of evidence collection in China:self-collection by parties and investigation and evidence collection by courts based on their functions and powers.However,with practical applications,drawbacks have gradually emerged.In the search for a new method of evidence collection,the lawyer's investigation order system emerged.From the perspectives of legislative technology and judicial application,the lawyer's investigation order system already possesses mature conditions for incorporation into law.Specifically,based on judicial practice explorations in various provinces and cities,it can be concluded that the lawyer's investigation order system faces application difficulties such as a lack of basic content regulations,urgent needs for standardized operational procedures,low cooperation from assisting obligees,and the absence of necessary disciplinary measures.Based on a detailed discussion of these application difficulties,this paper proposes path suggestions in terms of the legal status of the lawyer's investigation order,operational content,penalty systems,information,and linkage mechanisms.It aims to provide research ideas for improving this system on a theoretical basis.

关 键 词：民事诉讼 律师调查令 实现路径 

分 类 号：D914[政治法律—刑法学]