仲裁的检察监督初探  

A Study on the Supervision of Arbitration by Procuratorial organs

作　　者：胡留燕 徐前权[2] HU Liuyan;XU Qianquan(Henan Wanying Law Firm,Nanyang,Henan 473000;Changjiang University,Jingzhou,Hubei 434000,China)

机构地区：[1]河南宛英律师事务所,河南南阳473000 [2]长江大学,湖北荆州434000

出　　处：《长江工程职业技术学院学报》2024年第4期73-76,共4页Journal of Changjiang Institute of Technology

基　　金：湖北省人民检察院检察理论与应用研究重点课题“新时代检务保障制度研究”(编号:HJ2022A21)。

摘　　要：中共中央办公厅、国务院办公厅印发的《关于完善仲裁制度提高仲裁公信力的若干意见》强调要充分发挥社会监督的作用,启发我们关于检察机关实施仲裁监督的思考。目前,我国三大仲裁法均未明确规定检察机关对仲裁的监督,但并不代表仲裁不需要检察监督。应当在把握两办意见核心要义的基础上,针对我国现行三大仲裁制度的特点,找准检察机关对仲裁监督的切入点,探索检察机关监督仲裁的路径,进一步提高仲裁的公信力。Guidelines on Improving the Arbitration System and Enhancing the Credibility of Arbitration issued by the General Office of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the General Office of the State Council stresses social supervision should play a role,which inspires us to deliberate on the supervision of arbitration by procuratorial organs.At present,the three major arbitration laws of our country do not explicitly require the supervision of arbitration by the procuratorial organs,but that does not mean there is no need for the supervision of arbitration by procuratorial organs.Based on understanding the key points of the above government document and in view of the features of China's three existing arbitration system,the starting point of the procuratorial supervision of arbitration should be found to explore the path of the procuratorial supervision of arbitration,and further enhance the credibility of arbitration.

关 键 词：检察机关 仲裁监督 仲裁公信力 

分 类 号：D916.3[政治法律—法学]