缺位的董仲舒与刘贺的思想世界  

Invisible Dong Zhongshu and Liu He’s Mental World

作　　者：王刚[1] 常会营 Wang Gang;Chang Huiying(School of History,Culture and Tourism,Jiangxi Normal University,Nanchang,Jiangxi,330022;Institute of World Religions,Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing,China,102488)

机构地区：[1]江西师范大学历史文化与旅游学院,江西南昌330022 [2]中国社会科学院世界宗教研究所,中国北京102445

出　　处：《地方文化研究》2024年第4期25-38,共14页Local Culture Research

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“董仲舒传世文献考辨与历代注疏研究”(项目编号:19ZDA027)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：董仲舒及董学与刘贺的思想旨趣相交集,但在刘贺墓的出土资料中,这些不仅都付之阙如,而且在衣镜文中特意隐去董氏名号。这不是偶然,而是刘贺采取了有意为之的回避态度。之所以出现这样的情形,一则源于政治忌讳及高压态势,遵循“义不讪上,智不危身”的董学原则成为题中应有之义;二则是学术内在的立场冲突及规则所导致。刘贺延承师门之风,加之本人对于“王道”及“礼义”的重视,根据“论必称师,而不敢专己”的原则,隐去董氏之名,甚至对所引董生文字降格和删芟,遂成为颇具学术理路的选择。Dong Zhongshu and his academic study intersect with Liu He’s ideological interests.However,they were not mentioned in the archaeological materials unearthed from Haihun marquis mausoleum and Dong’s name was omitted intentionally in the inscription on the Confucius mirror.This is not coincidental,but rather a deliberate avoidance attitude adopted by Liu He.One reason for it is political taboos and a high-pressure situation.It became imperative to follow a principle in Dong’s study,namely,“adhering to morality without defaming superiors,and employing wisdom without endangering oneself”.Another reason for it stems from positional conflicts and rules in academy.Liu He inherited the tradition of his mentor and emphasized“kingly way”and“propriety and righteousness”.According to the principle of“always quoting one’s mentor without daring to be presumptuous”,his deliberate omission of Dong’s name and even downgrading and deleting references to Dong’s teachings,became a highly academic and reasonable choice.

关 键 词：董仲舒 刘贺 缺位 政治文化 学术立场 

分 类 号：G122[文化科学]