检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周祖成[1] 王一薄 Zhou Zucheng;Wang Yibo(Southwest university of political science and law,Chongqing,401120;Yingjing County People's Procuratorate,Ya'an City,Sichuan Province 625000)
机构地区:[1]西南政法大学行政法学院,重庆401120 [2]四川省雅安市荥经县人民检察院,四川雅安625000
出 处:《重庆社会科学》2024年第11期101-110,共10页Chongqing Social Sciences
摘 要:刑事庭前会议制度自2012年正式确立至今,对于推动庭审实质化,提高审判效率和质量发挥了重要作用。然而,从司法适用情况来看,庭前会议的适用不足,甚至潜存被虚置的危险,囿于此,在对庭前会议制度的生成作出分析之同时,对其实践适用整体偏低的因由作出厘定,并以此为基础,从制度的功能定位及其实践走向两个维度,对庭前会议制度作出具体设计。Since the formal establishment of the pre-trial conference system in criminal proceedings in 2012,it has played a significant role in promoting the substantialization of court trials,and improving the efficiency and quality of trials.However,from the perspective of judicial application,the application of pre-trial conferences is insufficient,and there is even a potential risk of being hollowed out.Therefore,while analyzing the genesis of the pre-trial conference system,this paper also clarifies the reasons for the overall low application in practice.Based on this,the system is specifically designed from two dimensions:the functional positioning of the system and its practical direction.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145