检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王文奇[1] WANG Wenqi(Jilin University,Changchun 130012,China)
机构地区:[1]吉林大学,吉林长春130012
出 处:《太平洋学报》2024年第11期1-17,共17页Pacific Journal
基 金:吉林大学哲学社会科学研究创新团队项目“中国特色国家安全道路与国家安全治理现代化研究”(2022CXTD21)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:西方国际关系理论为国际关系研究提供了理论范式,也在分析视角上对后者构成了束缚。选取国际关系历史知识,形成独特历史叙事模式,是西方国际关系理论建构的重要前提。西方国际关系理论奠基于19世纪欧洲的部分国际关系历史经验,以非历史主义的历史叙事形成了宏大理论。如果以历史主义为视角,以具体区域为考察对象,以文化政治中的身份研究为切入点,审视19世纪以来亚洲国家在追求和塑造自身国家身份过程中的亚洲情境,即亚洲国家如何认知和改造种族主义观念,如何理解和践行民族主义思想,有助于我们进一步批判西方国际关系理论的历史叙事,并为重构更为合理的国际关系历史叙事提供参考。Western theories of international relations provide a theoretical paradigm for the study on international relations,but also constitute a constraint on the latter in terms of analytical perspectives.The selection of historical knowledge of international relations and the formation of a unique historical narrative model are important prerequisites for the construction of the Western theories of international relations.These theories are based on some of the historical experiences of Europe in the 19th century,and they thus have formed a grand theory through non-historicist historical narratives.Having been taking historicism as a perspective,seeing specific regions as the object of examination,and locating identity research in cultural politics as the entry point,we can examine the Asian context in which Asian countries have pursued and shaped their own national identity since the 19th century.This shows how Asian countries recognize and transform racist concepts and demonstrates how they understand and practice nationalist ideas.This will help us further criticize the historical narrative of the Western theories and provide an opportunity for us to reconstruct the historical narrative of international relations.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49