多负责人模式对科研项目产出绩效的影响:以美国国家卫生研究院为例  

Impact of the multi-principal investigator system on output performance of scientific project:Insights from National Institutes of Health

作　　者：汪舒雯 黄柯境 郑知敏[3] 吴登生 WANG Shuwen;HUANG Kejing;ZHENG Zhimin;WU Dengsheng(Institutes of Science and Development,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100190,China;School of Public Policy and Management,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049,China;Bureau of Planning,National Natural Science Foundation of China,Beijing 100085,China;College of Management,Shenzhen University,Shenzhen 518055,China)

机构地区：[1]中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院,北京100190 [2]中国科学院大学公共政策与管理学院,北京100049 [3]国家自然科学基金委员会计划局,北京100085 [4]深圳大学管理学院,广东深圳518055

出　　处：《中国软科学》2024年第11期46-55,共10页China Soft Science

基　　金：国家自然科学基金科研项目“多负责人制度调研和政策分析”(J2224016)。

摘　　要：随着科学问题复杂化和科研合作日益频繁,多负责人模式的科研项目应运而生。然而,目前中国的科学基金资助机构在多负责人项目的实施上仍处于探索阶段,决策过程缺乏实证研究支撑。基于2006~2022年美国国立卫生研究院资助的项目,结合产出论文和专利绩效指标,构建计量经济模型,评估了多负责人项目与单一负责人项目的产出绩效差异,且对多负责人模式在不同经费额度项目中的异质性影响进行研究探讨。研究表明,多负责人项目在论文数量、专利数量、引用次数和创新性上优于单一负责人项目。同时,项目负责人数量与产出绩效之间存在复杂的非线性关系,且在经费额度较高的项目中,多负责人模式对产出绩效的正面影响更加明显。研究结果为国家自然科学基金委推广和实施科研项目多负责人政策提供了重要的实证依据。As scientific questions become increasingly complex and research collaborations more frequent,multi-principal investigators(M-PIs)model have emerged.However,Chinese science funding agencies are still in the exploratory phase of implementing M-PIs model,and the decision-making process lacks empirical research support.This paper constructs an econometric model based on projects funded by the U.S.National Institutes of Health from 2006 to 2022,combined with publication and patent performance metrics,to assess the output performance differences between M-PIs grants and single-PI grants.Moreover,this paper explores the heterogeneous effects of the M-PIs model across projects with varying levels of funding.The study demonstrates that M-PIs grants surpass single-PI grants in terms of the number of publications,patents,citations,and innovation.Furthermore,there is a complex non-linear relationship between the number of PIs and output performance,with the positive impact of the M-PIs model becoming more pronounced in higher-funded grants.This research provides important empirical evidence for the National Natural Science Foundation of China to promote and implement a M-PIs policy in scientific grants.

关 键 词：多负责人 科研合作 科研资助 产出绩效 

分 类 号：G302[文化科学]