检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈静 黄浩海[1] 张忠榕[1] 吴宜锐 Chen Jing;Huang Haohai;Zhang Zhongrong;Wu Yirui(Fujiang Institute of Scientific and Technological Information,Fuzhou Fujian 350003)
机构地区:[1]福建省科学技术信息研究所,福建福州350003
出 处:《情报探索》2024年第12期83-92,共10页Information Research
基 金:福建省省属公益类科研院所基本科研项目“运用大数据技术提升学术期刊出版能力建设研究——以图情类期刊《情报探索》为例”(项目编号:2023R1049)研究成果之一。
摘 要:[目的/意义]旨在为图书情报学类专业期刊《情报探索》提升学术引领能力,加强出版能力建设提供参考。[方法/过程]以2019—2023年期刊刊文的研究现状及热点趋势为突破口,使用CiteSpace可视化功能,选取10种图书情报学领域内的代表性专业期刊与《情报探索》期刊展开比较研究。[结果/结论]两者均能捕捉研究热点,后者研究视角更为微观;两者均能持续稳定输出研究成果,前者知识流动更为密集,热点知识聚类更加丰富,研究成果更为多元;两者均将“科技情报”研究作为当下及未来的重点方向,后者更倾向于科学计量与评价等更细颗粒度的“科技情报”研究以及“网络信息行为”研究;高校是两者的主要研究机构,后者研究机构性质更为单一,合作关系更为松散;两者整体作者合作关系较为稀松,后者作者合作规模较小,各作者群倾向于内部合作。[Purpose/significance]This study aims to provide reference for the professional journal of library and information science Information Research to improve its academic leading ability and strengthen its construction of publishing ability.[Method/process]Taking the research status and hot trends of journal articles from 2019 to 2023 as a breakthrough point,this paper selected ten representative professional journals in the field of library and information science and Information Research for comparative study by using CiteSpace visualization function.[Result/conclusion]Both of them can capture research hotspots,and the latter offers a more microscopic research perspective;both of them can continuously and stably output research results,the former has more intensive knowledge flow,more abundant hot knowledge clustering,and more diversified research results;both of them take the research of“scientific and technological information”as the key direction at present and in future,and the latter is more inclined to the research of“scientific and technological information”with more fine-grained such as scientific measurement and evaluation,and the research of“network information behavior”;colleges and universities are the main research institutions of the two,the research institutions of the latter are more single and the cooperative relationship is more loose;the overall author cooperation relationship between the two is relatively loose,the author cooperation of the latter is smaller,and the author groups tend to cooperate internally.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.58.216.183