检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:钟一苇 Zhong Yiwei(University of Southampton,Southampton,S0171BJ,UK)
出 处:《湖南警察学院学报》2024年第5期94-101,共8页Journal of Hunan Police Academy
摘 要:缘坐制度是我国古代一种以家族为基础的刑罚归责方式,其实效是使犯罪者和其一定服制内的亲属连带受罚,体现出中国古代法中“罪人以族”的传统思想导向。然而到了魏晋时期,缘坐制度在刑罚强度和株连范围上相较前代都呈现出限缩的态势。可以认为,该变化与这一时期法律儒家化的进步、法律形式的完善以及宗族关系发展之间具有内在的联系。通过对比数个魏晋南北朝时期具有代表性的缘坐案件,给予我们的启示是,在当今法治建设中应该平衡“罪责自负”原则和社会性连带责任制度的规制作用。In ancient times,the system of tandem guilt was a way of assigning blame based on consanguineous relationship,and its effect is to impose joint punishment on the offenders and their relatives within a certain scope of obligation.However,in the Wei and Jin Dynasties,the punishment intensity and scope of this system showed a trend of limitation and contraction.It can be argued that this change is intrinsically linked to the advancement of legal Confucianism,the refinement of legal forms and the development of clan relations during this period.By comparing several cases of tandem guilt during this period,we are inspired to balance the principle of"self-responsibility"and the regulatory role of the social system of joint liability in the construction of the rule of law today.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.16.135.179