论马克思实践辩证法对非人类中心主义“整体主义”认识论的超越  

On the Transcendence of Marx's Practical Dialectics over“Holistic”Epistemology of Non-anthropocentrism

作　　者：鲁桐君 左海慧 Lu Tongjun;Zuo Haihui(Xinyang Normal University,Xinyang,Henan 464000,China)

机构地区：[1]信阳师范大学马克思主义学院,河南信阳464000

出　　处：《漯河职业技术学院学报》2024年第6期76-81,共6页Journal of Luohe Vocational and Technical College

基　　金：河南省哲学社会科学规划项目“长期执政视域下中国共产党自我革命实践与创新研究”(2023BDJ015);信阳师范大学研究生科研创新基金资助项目“人与自然和谐共生现代化生成的哲学基础研究”(2024KYJJ001)。

摘　　要：非人类中心主义生态文化希望以人“不在场”的方式来解决生态环境问题,在其哲学认识论上体现为“整体主义”的认识范式。“整体主义”认识范式最终陷入为了拯救人而又消灭人的逻辑悖论。然而,解决生态环境问题的出发点和落脚点都应该立足于“现实的人”和“现实的社会”,马克思实践辩证法基于历史唯物主义立场,既主张“整体主义”认识范式的必要性,又确立“科学主义”认识范式的实践性,为走出非人类中心主义生态文化“整体主义”认识困境提供了科学的指导。It is hoped to solve ecological and environmental problems through“the absence of people”in the ecological culture of non-anthropocentrism,which is reflected in the concept of“holism”in its philosophical epistemology.The paradigm of“holism”ultimately falls into the logical paradox of saving and destroying people.However,the starting point and ultimate purpose of solving ecological and environmental problems should be based on“real people”and“real society”.On the basis of the historical materialism,Marx's practical dialectics not only advocates the necessity of the paradigm of“holism”,but also establishes the practicability of the pa-radigm of“scientism”,which provides scientific guidance for getting out of the epistemology dilemma of“holism”in the ecological culture of non-anthropocentrism.

关 键 词：非人类中心主义生态文化 “整体主义”认识论 马克思实践辩证法 

分 类 号：B023[哲学宗教—哲学理论]