机构地区:[1]山西省儿童医院妇幼保健院,山西太原030013 [2]山西医科大学护理学院,山西太原030001
出 处:《护士进修杂志》2024年第24期2639-2644,共6页Journal of Nurses Training
摘 要:目的探讨基于时限性自我调节理论(temporal self-regulation theory,TST)的干预方案在妊娠期妇女盆底肌锻炼(pelvic floor muscle training,PFMT)中的应用效果。方法采用便利抽样法,选取2023年2-5月山西省太原市某三级甲等妇幼专科门诊定期产检的孕妇100例,采用随机数字表法分为对照组和干预组,各50例,但中途对照组失访2例,退出1例,干预组退出1例,最终对照组47例,干预组49例,共纳入96例。对照组采用常规PFMT宣教,干预组在对照组基础上采用基于TST的干预方案,2组均观察至产后6~8周。比较2组妊娠期妇女干预前、干预6周和产后6~8周PFMT依从性、PFMT自我效能、尿失禁(urinary incontinence,UI)严重程度,以及产后6~8周盆底肌力情况。结果(1)干预前,2组PFMT依从性、PFMT自我效能、UI严重程度比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。(2)干预6周和产后6~8周,干预组PFMT依从性和PFMT自我效能均优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),但2组UI严重程度比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。(3)产后6~8周,干预组盆底肌力情况优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论基于TST的干预方案,可提高妊娠期妇女PFMT依从性和自我效能,提高产后盆底肌力。Objective To explore the application effect of the intervention program based on temporal self-regulation theory(TST)in pelvic floor muscle training(PFMT)for women in pregnancy.Methods A total of 100 cases of pregnant women who underwent regular maternity checkups in a tertiary-level A maternity and child specialty outpatient clinic in Taiyuan city,Shanxi province,from February to May 2023 were selected using convenience sampling method,and were divided into a control group and an intervention group of 50 cases each group by using the random number table method.However,2 cases in the control group were lost to follow-up and 1 case was withdrawn,and 1 case was withdrawn from the intervention group in the middle of the period.Finally,there were 47 cases of the control group and 49 cases of the intervention group,and a total of 96 cases were included.The control group used conventional PFMT preaching,and the intervention group used the TST-based intervention program based on the control group,and both groups were observed until 6-8 weeks postpartum.PFMT compliance,PFMT self-efficacy,urinary incontinence(UI)severity,and pelvic floor mus strength at 6-8 weeks postpartum were compared between the 2 groups of pregnant women before intervention,at 6 weeks after intervention,and at 6-8 weeks postpartum.Results(1)Before the intervention,there was no statistically significant difference in PFMT compliance,PFMT self-efficacy,and UI severity between the 2 groups(P>0.05).(2)At 6 weeks of intervention and 6-8 weeks postpartum,the PFMT compliance and PFMT self-efficacy of the intervention group were better than those of the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05),but the differences in the severity of UI were not statistically significant when comparing the 2 groups(P>0.05).(3)At 6-8 weeks postpartum,the pelvic floor muscle strength of the intervention group was better than that of the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion The TST-based intervention pro
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...