我国典型城市和机构药学研究领域科研合作偏好分析  

Analysis of Scientific Research Collaboration Preferences of Chinese Representative Cities and Institutions in the Field of Pharmacology and Pharmacy

作　　者：陈妍 潘黎姿 陈娟[2] 龙俊羽 欧阳昭连[2] CHEN Yan;PAN Lizi;CHEN Juan;LONG Junyu;OUYANG Zhaolian(Shenzhen Health Development Research and Data Management Center,Shenzhen,Guangdong,China 518028;Institute of Medical Information,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences,Beijing,China 100020;School of Medical Humanity,Peking University Health Science Center,Beijing,China 100191)

机构地区：[1]广东省深圳市卫生健康发展研究和数据管理中心,广东深圳518028 [2]中国医学科学院医学信息研究所,北京100020 [3]北京大学医学部医学人文学院,北京100191

出　　处：《中国药业》2024年第24期11-17,共7页China Pharmaceuticals

基　　金：国家自然科学基金[L1924064];中国医学科学院医学与健康科技创新工程项目[2021-I2M-1-056];广东省深圳市卫生健康发展研究和数据管理中心委托项目。

摘　　要：目的探讨我国典型城市和机构在药学研究领域的科研合作偏好。方法采用社会网络分析法,选择2021年1月至2023年8月全球药学研究领域发文量前500的城市和前500的机构,构建合作网络并计算中介中心性和聚类系数,同时对我国发文量前20的典型城市和机构进行可视化和量化分析。结果3年间,我国发文量前20的城市中介中心性基本保持稳定,聚类系数最低值持续下降,极值逐年拉大;北京在药学研究领域的国际合作倾向稳居第一。各典型机构总发文量之间的差距梯度较平缓,未形成明显断层,与城市发文趋势一致;在整体发文规模下降的趋势下,复旦大学、浙江大学等综合性大学的国际合作偏好性逐渐显现。结论我国各城市、各科研机构在药学研究领域的整体发文量及国际合作倾向逐渐降低。城市方面的国际合作,北京上海保持较高积极性;科研机构方面,复旦大学、浙江大学保持较高积极性。Objective To investigate the scientific research collaboration preferences of Chinese representative cities and institutions in the field of pharmacology and pharmacy.Methods The social network analysis method was used to construct a collaborative network of the top 500 cities and top 500 institutions with large publication quantity in the field of pharmacology and pharmacy worldwide from January 2021 to August 2023,the intermediary centrality and clustering coefficient were calculated.Meanwhile,the performance of the top 20 representative cities and institutions with large publication quantity in China were visually and quantitatively analyzed.Results Over the past three years,the intermediary centrality of the top 20 cities in China remained stable,with the lowest clustering coefficient continuously decreasing and the extremum increasing year by year;Beijing′s tendency for international collaboration in the field of pharmacology and pharmacy ranked first.The difference in the total quantity of publications among representative institutions was relatively small,with no obvious gap formed,which was consistent with the trend of publication quantity of cities.With the scale of publications decreased,the comprehensive universities such as Fudan University and Zhejiang University had the strong preference for international collaboration.Conclusion The overall publication quantity and international collaboration preference in the field of pharmacology and pharmacy among cities and research institutions in China is gradually decreasing,while Beijing,Shanghai,Fudan University,and Zhejiang University maintain much enthusiasm in international collaboration.

关 键 词：社会网络分析 药学研究 合作偏好 国际合作 

分 类 号：R95[医药卫生—药学]