检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐行[1,2] 张韵晗 XU Xing;ZHANG Yunhan
机构地区:[1]南开大学周恩来政府管理学院,天津300350 [2]南开大学周恩来研究中心
出 处:《学习与实践》2024年第12期3-12,F0002,共11页Study and Practice
摘 要:党内问责制是中国共产党坚持自我革命、深入贯彻依规治党的重要制度创新。既往研究侧重以“制度”这一核心概念为切入点,对党内问责制进行整体考量,而忽视了对制度行为者的应有关注。基于规范制度主义视角下“制度-行动”的关联性考察,通过总结党的十八大以来党内问责制的发展历程和经验,可以发现党内问责制的现实梗阻,进而分析造成梗阻的制度层面和行动者层面的深层次原因。未来,需从全方位完善党内问责制度体系和培养行动者的认知与行动能力两大方面着手,继续探索党内问责制的优化路径。Intra-party accountability is an important institutional innovation for the Communist Party of China(CPC)to insist on self-revolution and govern the Party according to rules.Existing research has focused on the core concept of institution as the entry point to examine intra-party accountability,while overlooking the actors within the institution.Following the perspective of the“institution-actor”correlation of normative institutionalism,this article examines and summarizes the development history,experience and existing deficiencies of the intra-party accountability system since the 18th National Congress of the CPC,and explores the optimization path accordingly.The study finds that there are two major deficiencies in the intra-party accountability system:the institutional deficiencies are mainly related to the content of the system's norms,operational processes and supporting systems,while the actor deficiencies are mainly related to their situational awareness,role identity and personal competence.In order to continue to promote the development of the intra-party accountability system,the intra-party accountability institutions need to be further improved in all aspects,and the cognitive and operational capabilities of the actors should be cultivated.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.180