从虚到实:绥山名实变迁与山名资源利用  

From Imaginary to Real-life:The Change of Name and Reality of Suishan Mountain and The Utilization of Mountain Name Resources

作　　者：杨朗 Yang Lang

机构地区：[1]西南大学历史地理研究所,重庆北碚400700

出　　处：《上海地方志》2024年第3期75-84,96,共11页Shanghai Chronicles

摘　　要：汉唐时期,绥山的指代颇为虚泛。汉晋之际,时人认知的绥山,大致位于峨眉山西南的越巂郡境内;隋唐时期,时人认知的绥山,大致为今金口河区、峨边县与峨眉山市的大渡河两岸诸山。宋代以后,因前代文献中绥山方位的模糊性与县名因素的影响,绥山从虚指之山逐渐实体化而被附会到中峨山与大蓬山上,经历了一个在地化的过程。后世,蜀中两座绥山之说并存,绥山山名与其所蕴含的独特文化,也被两地用作地方历史塑造与地方认同建构的资源。In the years from the Han Dynasty to the Tang Dynasty, the reference to Suishan Mountain was rathervague. In the years from the Han Dynastyto the Jin Dynasty, Suishan Mountain was considered to be roughly located in theYuexi County southwest of Mount Emei. In the years from the Sui Dynasty to the Tang Dynasty, Suishan Mountain was con⁃sidered the mountains on both sides of the Dadu River in Jinkouhe District, Ebian County and Emei City. After the SongDynasty, due to the vagueness of its location and the county names in the previous literature, Suishan Mountain wentthrough the localization process and materialized from an imaginary mountain into real - life Zhong’e Mountain and DapengMountain. In later dynasties, it was believed that there were two Suishan Mountains in Shu region. The name of SuishanMountain and its unique culture were used as resources for shaping local history and constructing local identity.

关 键 词：绥山 中峨山 大蓬山 名实关系 乡土历史重构 

分 类 号：K29[历史地理—历史学]