检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱宇辰 Zhu Yuchen(Hainan University,Haikou 570000)
机构地区:[1]海南大学,海口570000
出 处:《西部学刊》2024年第23期75-78,共4页Journal of Western
基 金:2019年国家社科基金项目“新型网络犯罪对传统刑事法理论的突破与应对研究”(编号:2019FBX062)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:对侵犯财产信息型公民个人信息罪的认定争议,源自于相关司法解释中梯度分级标准和个人信息分类概念的不明确性,以及理论上对该罪构成要件行为性质定性不明的问题。该类型罪名应当定性为目的犯,其符合短缩的二行为犯的外在表现与内在逻辑,并且从保护法益的角度出发,可以证成该罪名属于非法定的短缩二行为犯,要求行为人主观上具有利用涉财产公民个人信息以侵害财产利益的目的,且客观上侵犯的公民个人信息具备涉财产属性时,才能认定行为人侵犯的公民个人信息属于司法解释中所规定的“财产信息”,构成侵犯财产信息型公民个人信息罪。The controversy over the determination of the crime of infringing on citizens’personal information of property-related information stem from the ambiguity of the gradient grading standards and the concept of personal information classification in relevant judicial interpretations,as well as the problem of unclear determination of the nature of the constitutive acts of the crime in theory.This type of crime should be characterized as a crime with purpose,which conforms to the external manifestations and internal logic of the shortened two-action crime,and from the perspective of protecting legal interests,it can be proven that this crime belongs to a non-statutory shortened two-action crime.It requires that the perpetrator subjectively has the purpose of using the property-related citizens’personal information to infringe on property interests,and objectively,when the infringed citizens’personal information has the property-related attributes,can it be determined that the citizens’personal information infringed by the perpetrator belongs to the“property information”stipulated in the judicial interpretations,thus constituting the crime of infringing upon citizens’personal information of property-related information.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.210.23