检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘艳娜[1] 杨沁芸 Liu Yanna;Yang Qinyun(School of Humanities and Law(School of Public Administration),Yanshan University,Qinhuangdao 066004)
机构地区:[1]燕山大学文法学院(公共管理学院),秦皇岛066004
出 处:《西部学刊》2024年第23期83-87,共5页Journal of Western
基 金:2023年河北省社科发展项目“我国阻断法的适用问题及完善进路”(编号:20230201019)的最终成果。
摘 要:我国在《阻断外国法律与措施不当域外适用办法》出台前构筑了以公共秩序保留原则和国际礼让原则为基础的两条路径,以应对外国法律与措施超出合理幅度的不当域外适用。该办法的出台本是为这种法律应对提供帮助的良好契机,但呈现出的“严解释、不轻用”的态度却难以为抗衡不当域外适用提供真正助力。同时,美国冲突法中以利益分析为核心的法律选择方法为阻断法的效力发挥带来了挑战,积极执行与适用阻断法可以成为破局之道。只有通过转变法律态度、设置清单制度、加强域外抗辩等方式着力强化阻断法的法律功能,才能切实达致阻断法的法律目的。Before the issuance of the Rules on Counteracting Unjustified Extra-territorial Application of Foreign Legislation and Other Measures,China established two pathways based on the principles of reservation of public order and international comity,in order to address the inappropriate extraterritorial application of foreign laws and measures that exceed reasonable limits.The issuance of the rules was originally a good opportunity to provide assistance for such legal responses,but the attitude of“strict interpretation and cautious application”displayed makes it hardly to provide real assistance in resisting inappropriate extraterritorial applications.Meanwhile,the method of choice of law which centered on interest analysis in conflicts of law in American poses challenges to the effectiveness of the blocking statute,and actively implementing and applying the blocking statute can become a way to break through the situation.Only by transforming legal attitudes,establishing a listing system,and strengthening extraterritorial defenses can the legal function of the blocking statute be effectively strengthened,thereby truly achieving the legal purpose of the blocking statute.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200