认罪认罚案件中侦诉关系的重塑  

Reconstruction of the Relationship Between Investigation and Prosecution in Plea Bargaining Cases

作　　者：兰跃军[1] 蒋雨涵 Lan Yuejun;Jiang Yuhan(Law School of Shanghai University)

机构地区：[1]上海大学法学院,上海200444

出　　处：《山东警察学院学报》2024年第4期91-97,共7页Journal of Shandong Police College

基　　金：国家社科基金后期资助项目“法秩序统一原理下性侵未成年被害人保护研究”(项目编号:22FFXB033)的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：认罪认罚从宽制度的全面实施,推动侦查、起诉、审判、辩护关系的重新定位。而侦查和审查起诉是认罪认罚案件的关键阶段,受我国“流水作业式”诉讼构造的影响,认罪认罚案件侦诉关系仍然呈现以侦查为主的诉讼样态,侦诉机关存在权力失范风险。因此,应当重塑认罪认罚案件的侦诉关系,在审前阶段实现侦查和起诉的有机配合,构建侦诉协作的审前“大控方”格局。同时,应完善刑事指控的证据标准体系,激活侦查监督与协作配合机制,实现认罪认罚案件侦诉关系的良性互动。The comprehensive implementation of the leniency system for plea bargaining has promoted the repositioning of the relationships among investigation,prosecution,trial,and defense.In plea bargaining cases,the investigation and prosecution stages are crucial.However,influenced by China’s“assembly line”litigation structure,these cases still prioritize investigation,posing risks of power deviation in investigative and prosecutorial bodies.Therefore,the relationship between investigation and prosecution should be reconstructed to ensure effective collaboration during the pre-trial phase,creating an integrated prosecution framework.Additionally,the evidence standards for criminal charges should be improved,and mechanisms for investigative supervision and collaboration should be activated to facilitate positive interaction between investigation and prosecution in plea bargaining cases.

关 键 词：认罪认罚 侦诉关系 公诉主导 侦查监督 

分 类 号：D915.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]