中国《娥并与桑洛》与泰国《帕罗赋》源流关系研究  

An Investigation of the Source Relationship Between Ebing and Sangluo and Lilit Phra Lo

作　　者：刀承华 Dao Chenghua(Tianjin Foreign Studies University,Tianjin,300011,China;Yunnan Minzu University,Kunming,650031,China)

机构地区：[1]天津外国语大学,天津300011 [2]云南民族大学

出　　处：《东南亚纵横》2024年第6期10-19,共10页Crossroads：Southeast Asian Studies

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“傣、佤、景颇等云南跨境民族文学资源数据建设与研究”(16ZDA161)。

摘　　要：中国傣族的叙事长诗《娥并与桑洛》与泰国泰族的叙事长诗《帕罗赋》男主人公名字相似,同属于爱情悲剧作品,表现主题的手法相一致,《娥并与桑洛》应是《帕罗赋》的母本,两者是源和流的关系。两部作品的题材、悲剧冲突和结尾各不相同,这是泰国诗人根据泰国当时的社会现实和环境特征对《娥并与桑洛》进行重新组合的结果。历史上对民族生存发展有重大贡献的领袖人物往往成为民族历史记忆中的重要元素,进而成为文学创作的重要素材。文学传统有稳固性和传承性,无论民族是否经历过迁徙、迁徙到何方,文学传统都会在这个民族的后世文学中留存、显现;环境对文学有很大的制约作用,文学题材和主题会随着时代和环境的变迁发生变异。Ebing and Sangluo(Opem and Saamlua),a narrative poem of the Dai nationality in China,and Lilit Phra Lo,a narrative poem of Thailand,have similar names for the male protagonist,and both belong to the same genre of love tragedies and employ the same technique to express the theme.Ebing and Sangluo is the origin of Lilit Phra Lo and they are in a relation-ship of source and course.The two works,however,have different themes,tragic conflicts and endings,which are the result of a recombination of Ebing and Sangluo according to Thailand's social reality and environmental characteristics at that time.Lead-ers who have made great contributions to the survival and development of the nation in history often become important elements in the national historical memory,and then essential materials for the literary creation.Literary tradition has its stability and in-heritability.No matter whether or not a nation has experienced migration,where it has migrated to,its literary tradition remains and appears in its later literature.The environment has a great restricting effect on literature,and the topics and themes of litera-ture change with time and environment.

关 键 词：《娥并与桑洛》 《帕罗赋》 比较研究 源流关系 

分 类 号：I207.9[文学—中国文学]