《北京公约》中“威胁实施犯罪”条款衔接问题的法教义学分析  

Legal Doctrinal Analysis on the Connection of the“Threat to Commit an Offence”Provision in the Beijing Convention

作　　者：蒋其杉 JIANG Qishan

机构地区：[1]山东大学法学院

出　　处：《南京航空航天大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第6期54-61,共8页Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics AND Astronautics（Social Sciences）

摘　　要：《北京公约》新增“威胁实施犯罪”条款,衔接问题亟待讨论。在某种保守与激进并存的思维误区的影响下,研究中不乏增设新罪的立法呼吁。然而,“威胁实施犯罪”条款所涉法益并无特殊之处,当前《刑法》罪名供给充分,并不存在明显的处罚漏洞。罪名缺失的误判源于对犯罪形态的误解、关联罪名的疏忽、立法论与解释论基本顺位的混淆以及航空领域集体法益探讨的不充分。于刑法各界而言,“威胁实施犯罪”条款的积极意义体现在对具体罪名的解释与理论模型的细化上。With the addition of the“threat to commit an offence”provision to the Beijing Convention,the issues concerning the connection need to be discussed.Under the influence of a certain misconception that embraces both conservative and radical viewpoints,there are legislative calls for creating new offences in research.However,there is nothing special about the legal interests involved in the“threat to commit an offence”provision,and the existing Criminal Law provides sufficient charges without obvious loopholes in punishment.The misjudgment about a lack of charges stems from the misunderstanding of offence patterns,the negligence of related charges,the confusion between legislative and interpretative theory priorities,and the insufficient exploration of collective legal interests in the aviation field.For the criminal law community,the“threat to commit an offence”provision is conducive to interpreting specific charges and refining theoretical models.

关 键 词：法益 北京公约 威胁实施犯罪 刑法教义学 

分 类 号：D993.4[政治法律—国际法学] D924[政治法律—法学]