检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:耿伟伟 GENG Weiwei
机构地区:[1]中共孝感市委党校
出 处:《世界华文教学》2024年第2期69-85,共17页
摘 要:本文从文化视角对近现代印尼华文教育做了重新检视,发现:近现代印尼华文教育带有文化传承的基因并与文化的兴衰呈正相关;“华文教育”概念在不同语境下具有三层含义;“中国文化”与“中华文化”以及“华人文化”三者概念具有模糊性。这些概念的模糊使得当前学者对印尼华文教育研究出现了观察者偏差,为了区分,本文将印尼“华文教育”按文化传承内容分为“华侨教育”、“华文教育”和“华人教育”三类,在批判“中国中心论”的同时,着力指出三种文化传承内容之间的区别。本文认为,30多年的强制同化政策使得印尼华人再次“克里奥尔化”,当下的印尼华人教育其实是印尼华人在自觉或不自觉中进行的一场包含语言在内的以华人性为核心的华族文化的复兴。This paper re-examines the modern Chinese education in Indonesia from a cultural perspective,and finds that the Chinese education in Indonesia has a cultural inheritance gene and is positively related to the rise and fall of Chinese culture;the concept of“Chinese education”is different in different contexts;the ambiguity between the concepts of“China’s culture”and“Chinese culture”and“the culture of Chinese diaspora”.It is the ambiguity of these concepts that makes current scholars have an observer bias in Indonesian Chinese education research.This article divides Indonesian“Chinese education”into“Overseas Chinese Education”,“Ethnic Chinese Education”and“Chinese Diaspora Education”according to cultural inheritance.While criticizing the“Sinocentrism”,this paper believes that more than 30-year compulsory assimilation policy has caused Indonesian Chinese to“Creolized”again.The current Indonesian Chinese education is a renaissance of Chinese culture centered on the“Chinese-ness”from a cultural perspective.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7