构建中华道教文化的学术话语  

Rebuilding the A cademic Discourse of Chinese Daoist Culture

作　　者：张志刚 Zhang Zhigang(Center for Judaic and Inter-religious Studies,School of Philosophy and Social Development,Shandong University,Jinan 250100,China)

机构地区：[1]山东大学犹太教与跨宗教研究中心,济南250100

出　　处：《北京大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2024年第6期37-47,共11页Journal of Peking University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

摘　　要：在国际学界的文化比较研究中,“哲学”与“宗教”可谓探究不同文化形态的精神源流及其主要性质的两个基本概念。但从基础理论上反省现当代中国人文学术史却可以发现,我国学者长期以来大多是仿效“西方传入的哲学与宗教概念”来辨析中华传统文化的三大思想源流“儒、道、释”,并对“儒、道、释”的主要文化属性——主要是“哲学”还是“宗教”加以简单定性或陷入学术争论的。这种治学方法既不能如实揭示中华传统文化的原本性质,更无法阐扬中华优秀传统文化的时代价值。鉴于此,以“中华大地土生土长的道教”作为考察典型,扼要梳理道教研究的学术史,讨论中华道教文化研究的学术话语构建。In the comparative cultural studies of the international academic field,"philosophy"and"religion"are two main categories for investigating the spiritual origins and the main characters of various cultures.Upon reexamining the foundational ideas for the humanistic and cultural studies in modern and contemporary China,one may find out that for most of the time,a majority of Chinese scholars have been following the notions of philosophy and religion imported from the West in analyzing the three main origins of traditional Chinese thought,i.e.Confucianism,Taoism and Buddhism.Consequently,they either jumped to conclusions about the main culural character of the three schools of thought-"philosophy"or"religion"became involved in the resulting academic disputes.Such an approach proves to be not helpful,either for revealing the true nature of traditional Chinese culture,or for expounding the epochal value of those excellent aspects of traditional Chinese culture.In the light of the above,this paper specifically considers the"homegrown"Taoism as an example for observation,i.e.by briefly reflecting upon the academic history of Taoist studies,to make a case for constructing the academic discourse for the study of Chinese Taoist culture.

关 键 词：中华道教文化 西方概念影响 回归传统文化本色 构建学术话语 阐发时代价值 

分 类 号：B95[哲学宗教—宗教学]