检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:唐园园 Yuanyuan Tang(School of Law,Jiangsu University,Zhenjiang Jiangsu)
机构地区:[1]江苏大学法学院,江苏镇江
出 处:《法学(汉斯)》2024年第11期6273-6282,共10页Open Journal of Legal Science
摘 要:《个人信息保护法》第70条明确了个人信息保护公益诉讼制度,但只对个人信息保护领域检察公益诉讼做出了简易的原则性规定,对于检察机关如何在实践中操作却没有可依据的具体条款。检察机关在诉讼相关标准、取证调查、损害赔偿诉讼请求等方面仍有完善的空间。在未来实践中,应进一步细化相关条文,简化前置程序;赋予检察机关在调查取证时的强制性措施权;在个人信息检察公益诉讼中建立惩罚性赔偿制度,继而发挥检察机关的示范引领作用。Article 70 of the Personal Information Protection Law clarifies the system of public interest litigation for personal information protection,but only provides simple principle provisions for public interest litigation in the field of personal information protection,without specific provisions for how the procuratorial organs operate in practice.There is still room for improvement in the standards related to litigation,evidence collection and investigation,and claims for damages compensation by the procuratorial organs.In future practice,relevant provisions should be further refined and pre procedures simplified;grant the procuratorial organs the power of compulsory measures during investigation and evidence collection;establish a punitive damages system in personal information public interest litigation,and then play a demonstrative and leading role in the procuratorial organs.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.58.45.209