检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:何胜男 Shengnan He(School of Law and Politics,Zhejiang Sci-Tech University,Hangzhou Zhejiang)
机构地区:[1]浙江理工大学法政学院,浙江杭州
出 处:《法学(汉斯)》2024年第11期6484-6489,共6页Open Journal of Legal Science
摘 要:近年来,人工智能的发展为我们社会带来了便利的同时,也可能导致犯罪的风险。传统弱人工智能犯罪的风险具有工具属性,可以由刑法进行直接规制,而强人工智能犯罪由于其具有一定的自主意识可以脱离控制者进行自主学习,由此产生了强人工智能是否承担刑事责任的争议。ChatGPT作为强人工智能的代表,已经普遍运用在我们的生活中,对其犯罪责任进行研究可以推动人工智能犯罪规制的向前发展。In recent years,the development of artificial intelligence has brought convenience to our society while also potentially leading to the risk of crime.The risk of traditional weak artificial intelligence crime has tool attributes and can be directly regulated by criminal law.However,strong artificial intelligence crime,due to its certain autonomous consciousness and the ability to conduct autonomous learning independently from the controller,has led to disputes over whether strong artificial intelligence should bear criminal responsibility.As a representative of strong artificial intelligence,ChatGPT has been widely used in our lives.Studying its criminal responsibility can promote the forward development of the regulation of artificial intelligence crime.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7