检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张玮 Wei Zhang(School of Politics,Zhejiang Sci-Tech University,Hangzhou Zhejiang)
机构地区:[1]浙江理工大学法政学院,浙江杭州
出 处:《法学(汉斯)》2024年第11期6567-6571,共5页Open Journal of Legal Science
摘 要:《行政处罚法》确立了一事不再罚的法律原则,但在实际操作中,特别是对于连续性交通违法行为如持续违法停车等,其具体应用存在一定的模糊性。交通执法不仅关系到公共秩序的维护,也与公民的合法权益紧密相连。面对连续多日的违法停车行为,仅进行一次处罚可能降低违法成本,不足以发挥行政处罚的教育和惩戒作用;而重复处罚则可能侵犯当事人的合法权益,影响处罚的合法性和公正性。因此,如何在确保公共秩序和保护当事人权益的同时,合理运用行政处罚,体现其教育与惩戒功能,成为亟待解决的问题。“Administrative Penalty Law”establishes the legal principle of no longer punishment for a single incident,but in practical operation,especially for continuous traffic violations such as continuous illegal parking,there is a certain degree of ambiguity in its specific application.Traffic law enforcement is not only related to the maintenance of public order,but also closely linked to the legitimate rights and interests of citizens.Facing consecutive days of illegal parking behavior,only one punishment may reduce the cost of the violation and is not sufficient to play the educational and punitive role of administrative penalties.Repeated punishment may infringe upon the legitimate rights and interests of the parties involved,affectingthe legality and fairness of the punishment.Therefore,how to use administrative penalties reasonably while ensuring public order and protecting the rights and interests of the parties,and reflecting their educational and punitive functions,has become an urgent problem to be solved.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.219.81.99