检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马若滢 Ruoying Ma(Law School,Xinjiang University,Urumqi Xinjiang)
机构地区:[1]新疆大学法学院,新疆乌鲁木齐
出 处:《法学(汉斯)》2024年第11期6697-6704,共8页Open Journal of Legal Science
摘 要:《中华人民共和国民法典》第111条对自然人的信息受法律保护进行了明确规定。立法对该项利益的民法属性并未进行明晰,这种立法上的留白在学界引起了较大争议。个人信息的民法属性究竟是法益抑或权利,在学者中有着不同的解读,逐渐划分为“民事权利说”和“法益说”两大阵营。《民法总则》第111条对个人信息保护的文本表述缺乏法定权利的规范外观,同时个人信息利益符合法益所保护之利益的构成要素,即未被现有权利所保护、具有有用性及合法性。民法典分编相关内容应承接《民法总则》第111条确立的法益保护路径,继续细化个人信息保护标准,将个人信息这一利益的民法属性归为法益,而非民事权利。Article 111 of the Civil Code of the People’s Republic of China clearly stipulates the legal protection of natural persons’information.The legislature has not clarified the civil law attributes of this interest,which has caused considerable controversy in the academic community.There are dif-ferent interpretations among scholars as to whether personal information is a legal interest or a right.It has gradually been divided into two camps,namely the“civil right theory”and the“legal interest theory”.The textual expression of Article 111 of the General Provisions of the Civil Law lacks the normative appearance of a statutory right,and at the same time,the interest of personal information meets the elements of interests protected by legal interests,namely,not being protected by existing rights,being useful,and being legal.The relevant provisions of the Civil Code’s division should follow the legal interest protection path established by Article 111 of the General Provisions of the Civil Law and continue to refine the standards for personal information protection.The civil law attributes of personal information should be regarded as a legal interest,rather than a civil right.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.17.156.160