检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张静静 陈世香[1] ZHANG Jing-jing;CHEN Shi-xiang(School of Politics and Public Management,Wuhan University,Wuhan,Hubei 430072,China)
机构地区:[1]武汉大学政治与公共管理学院,湖北武汉430072
出 处:《湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2024年第6期40-45,共6页Journal of Xiangtan University:Philosophy And Social Sciences
摘 要:推进“互联网+政务服务”改革进程是提升国家治理体系和治理能力现代化的重要举措,也是“放管服”改革和政府简政放权的有机结合。基于此,以贵州省贵安新区为例,运用S-CAD政策方法,在明确方法各要素的基础上对“互联网+政务服务”相关政策进行一致性分析、充要性分性和可行性分析。结果表明,“互联网+政务服务”政策逻辑严谨,政策要素间一致性程度较高,政策手段是其他政策要素的必要不充分条件,政策可行性较强,整体实施效果较好,但政策在实施过程中仍然存在不少问题。下一步应从法律法规、平台体系、监督机制和工作手段等方面进行优化完善。Promoting the reform process of“Internet+government services”is an important measure to enhance the modernization of our national governance system and governance capacity.It is also an organic combination of the“delegation,supervision,and service”reform and that of“streamlining the government,delegating power,and improving government services”.Based on this,this paper takes Gui’an New Area of Guizhou Province as an example,and applies the S-CAD policy methodology to analyze the consistency,adequacy and feasibility of the policies related to the“Internet+Government Service”upon clarifying the elements of the methodology.The results show that the policy of“Internet+government services”is logically rigorous,the degree of consistency between policy elements is high,the policy means is a necessary but insufficient condition for other policy elements,the policy feasibility is strong,and the overall implementation effect is better,but there are still quite a few problems with the policy in the process of implementation.This study concludes that the next step should be to optimize and improve the laws and regulations,platform system,supervision mechanism and working tools.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.119.120.229