“隔空猥亵”目的性扩张解释的限缩规制  

Limitations and Regulations on the Purposeful Expansion of the Interpretation of Molestation in Cyberspace

作　　者：刘伟 Liu Wei

机构地区：[1]重庆市人民检察院第四分院

出　　处：《青少年犯罪问题》2024年第6期110-122,共13页Issues on Juvenile Crimes and Delinquency

摘　　要：“隔空猥亵”是随着互联网的发展、社交媒体的普及,相较于传统线下犯罪,猥亵不法行为在行为构造上呈现的新形态。运用客观目的解释,将部分“隔空猥亵”儿童行为纳入猥亵儿童罪予以规制具有实质正当性、现实合理性,但应警惕基于政策冲动下“隔空猥亵”犯罪圈无限扩张的内在危险。对于采取远程、非接触、非强制方式,并且儿童未参与并暴露自己身体敏感部位的观看型“隔空猥亵”行为,原则上不宜认定为猥亵儿童罪。对素不相识等特定场景下的“隔空猥亵”,推定“应当明知”构成要件主观要素的免证推定归责机制应相应调试限缩,实现法益保护与人权保障间的平衡结果。With the development of the Internet and the popularity of social media,"indecency"is a new form of behavior structure of indecency compared with traditional offline crimes.Using objective purposes to explain,it is substantively legitimate and practically reasonable to include some acts of"molesting children in a space"in the crime of molesting children for regulation.However,we should be wary of the inherent danger of the unlimited expansion of the criminal circle of"molesting children in a space"based on policy impulses.It is not advisable to classify the act of viewing type"molestation of children through remote,non-contact,and non coercive means,and the child has not participated in or exposed their sensitive body parts,as the crime of molesting children.The exemption and limitation of the subjective element of presumption of liability for"ought to have known"in specific scenarios such as strangers should be adjusted accordingly to achieve a balance between the protection of legal interests and the protection of human rights.

关 键 词：猥亵儿童 隔空猥亵儿童 扩张解释 限定处罚范围 

分 类 号：D924.34[政治法律—刑法学]