检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王霞[1] 淮建军[1] 张璠 Wang Xia;Huai Jianjun;Zhang Fan(College of Economics and Management,Northwest A&F University,Xianyang 712100,China;College of Humanities and Law,Northeastern University,Shenyang 110169,China)
机构地区:[1]西北农林科技大学经济管理学院,陕西咸阳712100 [2]东北大学文法学院,辽宁沈阳110169
出 处:《科技管理研究》2024年第21期46-53,共8页Science and Technology Management Research
基 金:国家自然科学基金面上项目“新冠疫灾与气象灾害耦合作用下黄土高原农户应对多重风险的生计恢复研究”(42075172)。
摘 要:为实现农业农村现代化和推进数字农业建设,以数字农业政策为切入点,评估政策的科学性与合理性。通过内容分析法对25项数字农业政策进行梳理,借助ROST CM6.0提取核心关键词,绘制语义网络图,构建政策一致性指数模型对10项样本政策进行量化评价。结果发现:10项样本政策的PMC指数均值是6.48,其中1项优秀、6项良好、3项及格,说明政策整体水平设计较为科学合理,但也存在政策内容不完善、时效过长、视角单一的问题据此探索构建了“主体-领域-内容-评价-效力”的五维评价框架,建立数字农业政策评价指标,从政策性质、政策时效、政策视角对10项样本政策提出优化建议,为提高政策评价的客观性和准确性提供参考。In order to realize the modernization of agriculture and rural areas and promote the construction of digital agriculture,the scientific and rational nature of the policy should be evaluated by taking the digital agriculture policy as the starting point.Through the content analysis method,25 digital agriculture policies are sorted out,the core keywords are extracted with the help of ROST CM6.0,the semantic network diagram is drawn,and the policy consistency index model is constructed to quantitatively evaluate the 10 sample policies.The results show that the average PMC index of the 10 sample policies is 6.48,of which 1 is excellent,6 are good,and 3 are passing,indicating that the overall level design of the policy is relatively scientific and reasonable,but there are also problems such as imperfect policy content,too long timeliness and a single perspective.Accordingly,this paper exploratory constructs a five-dimensional evaluation framework of"subject-field-content-evaluation-effectiveness",establishes the digital agricultural policy evaluation index,and puts forward optimization suggestions for 10 sample policies from the perspectives of policy nature,policy timeliness,and policy perspective,so as to provide a reference for improving the objectivity and accuracy of the policy evaluation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3