智能时代学术活动的社会学反思  

Sociological Reflection on Academic Activities in the Age of Intelligence

作　　者：毛颖[1] 刘溪[2] 赵艺懋 毛小凰[4] MAO Ying;LIU Xi;ZHAO Yimao;MAO Xiaohuang(Editorial Department of Journal,Kunming Metallurgy College,Kunming 650033,China;Faculty of Business,Kunming Metallurgy College,Kunming 650033,China;Labors'Union,Kunming Metallurgy College,Kunming 650033,China;Division of Academic Affairs,Kunming Metallurgy College,Kunming 650033,China)

机构地区：[1]昆明冶金高等专科学校学报编辑部,云南昆明650033 [2]昆明冶金高等专科学校商学院,云南昆明650033 [3]昆明冶金高等专科学校校工会,云南昆明650033 [4]昆明冶金高等专科学校教务处,云南昆明650033

出　　处：《昆明冶金高等专科学校学报》2024年第5期103-110,共8页Journal of Kunming Metallurgy College

基　　金：云南省科学技术期刊编辑学会2024年课题“智能时代的学术生产与科技期刊出版伦理困境”(YKKX2024-C3);昆明冶金高等专科学校科研基金项目“科教融汇背景下工作室制知识产权创新性人才培养研究”(2023sgjhzxy15)。

摘　　要：从社会学角度分析智能时代学术活动中出现的道德、伦理、垄断、资本化等问题,发现:AI学术活动的本质是一种有限的、工具化倾向的理性行为;工具理性思维的滥用,加剧了“学术垄断+学术资本化”教条化、去生命化的趋势,使学术个人面临科学精神消解、独立思考能力下降和学术道德丧失的危机。科技的发展方向事关人类命运。建立正确的科学价值观,发展兼顾功能性和安全性,保持严格的应用边界的AI技术,有助于科技服务人类福祉。From the sociological perspective,this paper analyzes the problems of morality,ethics,monopoly and capitalization in academic activities in the age of intelligence.It finds that the essence of AI-driven academic activities is characterized by limited and instrumental rational behavior;The abuse of instrumental rationality has aggravated the dogmatic and depersonalizing trends of“academic monopoly”and“academic capitalization”,leading to a crisis for academic individuals marked by the dissolution of the scientific spirit,adecline of independent thinking,and a loss of academic integrity.The development direction of science and technology is intrinsically linked to the fate of humanity.Establishing correct scientific values,developing AI technology that balances functionality with security,and maintaining strict application boundaries will help ensure that science and technology serve the bright future of mankind.

关 键 词：人工智能 工具理性 学术道德 学术垄断 学术资本化 

分 类 号：G302[文化科学]