差序格局与现代法治  

Differential Mode of Association and Modern Legal Governance

作　　者：卢毅 刘小平[1,2] Lu Yi;Liu Xiaoping

机构地区：[1]吉林大学法学院 [2]吉林大学理论法学研究中心

出　　处：《中国文化与管理》2024年第2期123-139,260,261,共19页Chinese Culture and Management

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“以人民为中心的法治思想及其制度建构研究”(项目编号:22JJD820003)的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：差序格局与现代法治之间存在明显张力,现有主流观点认为在公共领域中差序格局和现代法治不能并存。差序格局有差序性和人文性两重内涵。差序格局在当代社会转型中出现人文性的价值式微,使得法治出场实现了社会秩序的整合。但是法治出场并不必然蕴含着差序格局的消亡。现代形式法治存在着法律工具主义等功能局限,而差序格局“根据中国”的人文性价值恰恰暗合主体性中国的理想图景,从而有助于推动差序格局实现自身的创造性转化。基于塔玛纳哈的法治模型,现代社会蕴含个人权利、正义和社会福祉的人文价值要素,预设差序格局与法治相融合的可能性,并逐步迈向一种实质法治观。The differential mode of association and modern legal governance,clearly in tension,cannot coexist in the public domain in mainstream view.The differential mode of association embodies two inherent aspects:differential order and humanistic value whose declining in contemporary social transformation facilitates the emergence of the legal governance which integrates social order.However,the emergence of the legal governance,with functional limitations such as legal instrumentalism,does not necessarily entail the extinction of the differential mode of association.In contrast,the inherent humanistic values grounded in“Chinese context”,exactly align with the ideal vision of a subjective China,thereby contributing to the differential mode of association s creative transformation.Based on Tamanaha s model of the legal governance,modern society inherently contains humanistic value elements such as individual rights,justice,and social welfare,which presuppose the possibility of integrating the differential mode of association with the legal governance and gradually advancing towards a substantive legal governance view.

关 键 词：差序格局 形式法治 实质法治 现代社会 创造性转化 

分 类 号：D920.0[政治法律—法学]