检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘潼福[1] LIU Tongfu
机构地区:[1]上海社会科学院《社会科学》杂志社
出 处:《哲学分析》2024年第6期72-83,193,共13页Philosophical Analysis
摘 要:中西哲学的比较和结合已有上百年的历史,由于本体论问题的深邃难解,学术观点的纷争始终不休。在柏拉图、亚里士多德和欧几里得三种形式不同但性质一致的本体论中存在着矛盾的共性,以“本体矛盾”去观察分析中西文化结合的可行性路径,则会发现,原来最普遍的“物质运动”现象潜藏着最深刻的本质,这个本质可以成为中西哲学结合的逻辑起点。The comparison and integration of Chinese and Western philosophy have a history of over a hundred years.Due to the profound and intractable issues of ontology,academic disputes have persisted.There exists a contradictory commonality among the ontologies of Plato,Aristotle,and Euclid,which differ in form but are consistent in nature.By observing and analyzing the feasibility of the integration of Chinese and Western cultures through“ontological contradictions”,the status and value of the logical relationship of“material motion”become apparent.By elevating“material motion”from empirical common sense to the level of ontological concepts,it can be discovered that the most universal phenomena often conceal the most profound essence,which can serve as the logical starting point for integrating Chinese and Western philosophy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38