夏衍的追述与“党的电影小组”的基本史实之演变  

Xia Yan's Recounting and the Evolution of the Basic Historical Facts of the"Film Group of the Communist Party of China"

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:宫浩宇 Gong Haoyu

机构地区:[1]南京大学文学院,江苏南京210023

出  处:《南京艺术学院学报(音乐与表演版)》2024年第6期125-133,I0003,共10页JOURNAL OF NANJING UNIVERSITY OF THE ARTS:Music & Performance

摘  要:学界对于“党的电影小组”的活动及意义的描述与阐发,往往甚于对其基本史实的实证考察。现有关于其基本史实的著述,皆源于夏衍个人的回忆而缺少一手史料的支撑,而其成员与同路人的相关忆述,以及后世史家对这些基本史实的书写,则大体上照搬了夏衍的说法,只在个别细节上或有所发挥。夏衍的回忆,也就因此在很大程度上建构出我们如今所熟知的“党的电影小组”的基本面貌及其在影史书写中的演变。在中国电影史上占有如此重要地位的一个电影组织,倘若始终处在一手史料付之阙如的状态上,实属憾事,甚至不免会反噬其真实性。The academia often pays more attention to describing and elaborating the activities of the"Party’s film group"and its significance than investigating its basic historical facts.Existing writings on the historical facts of the"Party’s film group"are all based on Xia Yan's personal memories and lack the support of first-hand historical materials.Related recollections of the group members and witnesses,as well as writings by later historians,generally copy Xia Yan's statements,adding only specific details.Xia Yan's recounting has thus formed to a large extent the basic depiction of the"Party's film group"and its evolution in the film history as we know it today.It is a pity that an organization occupying such an important position in the history of Chinese cinema is always in a state where first-hand historical materials are missing,and this will even inevitably backfire on the authenticity of its history.

关 键 词:夏衍 党的电影小组 基本史实 回忆 左翼电影 

分 类 号:J909[艺术—电影电视艺术]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象