青年发展型城市环境指数测度及空间差异分析  

Analysis of Environmental Index Measurement and Spatial Difference in Youth Development City

作  者:王凤科[1] 吴琴琴 WANG Fengke;WU Qinqin(School of Business,Henan University of Science and Technology,Luoyang Henan 471023,China)

机构地区:[1]河南科技大学商学院,河南洛阳471023

出  处:《生态经济》2025年第1期123-131,共9页Ecological Economy

基  金:河南省科技厅软科学项目“河南省生态环境与经济发展的耦合水平测度与对策研究”(232400410451);洛阳市社会科学规划项目“青年发展型城市建设研究——以洛阳市为例”(2023A010)。

摘  要:基于国家45个青年发展型试点城市的宏观数据,构建青年发展型城市环境指数测度指标体系。采用EM-TOPSIS模型测度各城市的维度得分以及综合水平,使用变异系数法测量四大地区内城市的环境指数差异,结合地理探测器来探测七大环境因子的空间分异解释和驱动能力。结果显示:生活环境的评价均分最高,其次是规划环境,就业环境评价均分最低;四大地区内部城市在各维度表现上具有一定的差异性,其中西部和东部地区差异性最大,部分城市在各环境指数间具有明显的不平衡性;通过计算,将45个城市划分为高水平、中等水平、低水平等级;在因子与交互探测上,健康环境因子和就业环境因子的解释能力最强,其次是规划环境因子和经济环境因子,且两因子间的交互驱动力都强于各个单因子的驱动力。Based on macro data from 45 pilot cities for youth development in China,a measurement index system for the environmental index of youth development cities is constructed.This study employed the EM-TOPSIS model to measure the dimensional scores and comprehensive levels of each city,used the coefficient of variation method to measure the environmental index differences of cities within the four major regions,and combined the geographic detector to detect the spatial differentiation interpretation and driving ability of the seven major environmental factors.The results show that the average score of living environment evaluation is the highest,followed by planning environment,and the average score of employment environment evaluation is the lowest.There are certain differences in the performance of cities within the four major regions in various dimensions,with the western and eastern regions having the greatest differences,and some cities showing significant imbalances among environmental indicators.45 cities are divided into three levels of high,medium,and low through calculation.In terms of factor and interaction detection,the explanatory power of health environment factor and employment environment factor is the strongest,followed by planning environment factor and economic environment factor,and the interaction driving force between the two factors is stronger than that of each single factor.

关 键 词:青年发展型城市 环境指数 EM-TOPSIS模型 地理探测器 空间差异 

分 类 号:F299.2[经济管理—国民经济] F062.2

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象