检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘小年[1] LIU Xiaonian(School of Laws and Social Work,Dongguan University of Technology,Dongguan 523106,China)
机构地区:[1]东莞理工学院法律与社会工作学院,广东东莞523106
出 处:《东莞理工学院学报》2024年第6期76-83,共8页Journal of Dongguan University of Technology
基 金:东莞市社会治理研究专项一般课题“社会治理的政策评估模式研究”(2021SHZLYB05)。
摘 要:传统社会管理实践向社会治理的转变,需要建构与之相适应的政策评估模式。现有研究力图扬弃与传统社会管理要求契合的反映实证精神的第一至三代评估模式,发展反映政策评估中的价值层面的建构主义方式即第四代评估,以及尝试将评估中的事实与价值层面相统一的实证辩论逻辑即所谓的第五代评估,但在评估实践的流程构造与范围建构方面仍然未能满足社会治理在政策评估上的要求。基于马克思的现实的个人思想,社会生活是有意识有需要的实践者,通过与其他人的社会交换互动,展开的面向自然的社会生产过程。建构面向社会治理实践的政策评估模式,需要基于实践中事实与价值相统一的属性与实践所处的社会、自然等条件,以及实践的社会互动过程特点,合理界定评估的范围,建构具有操作性的评估流程。传统评估模式的发展需要的新的社会治理政策评估模式的建构,可以应用D市财政绩效评价的案例来说明。利用学术研究的进展,建构了一个基于实践的、可操作的社会治理的政策评估模式。The transformation of traditional social management practice to social governance requires the construction of a corresponding policy evaluation model.The existing research attempts to abandon the first-to-third-generation evaluation model that reflects the empirical spirit that is in line with the requirements of traditional social management,develop a constructivist method that reflects the value level in policy evaluation,that is,the fourth generation of evaluation,and try to unify the facts and value level in the evaluation,the so-called fifth generation evaluation,but the process structure and scope construction of evaluation practice still fail to meet the requirements of social governance in policy evaluation.Based on Marx’s realistic personal thought,social life is a natural-oriented social production process unfolded by conscious and needy practitioners through social exchange and interaction with others.To construct a policy evaluation model oriented to social governance practice,it is necessary to reasonably define the scope of evaluation and construct an operational evaluation process based on the attributes of unity of facts and values in practice,the social and natural conditions in which practice is located,as well as the characteristics of the social interaction process of practice.The development of the traditional evaluation model needs to be combined with the construction of a new social governance policy evaluation model,which can be illustrated by applying the case of a city’s fiscal performance evaluation.The possible contribution of this paper lies in adapting to the practice of social management to social governance and its needs in policy evaluation,and using the progress of academic research to construct a practice-based and operable policy evaluation model of social governance.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200