宋代“鞫谳分司”制下司法参军的司法实践——以毛滂的“检法”实例为视角  

Judicial Practice of Si Fa Can Jun under the“Ju Yan Fen Si”System in the Song Dynasty:Based on the Example of Mao Pang's Judicial Case

作　　者：柴荣[1] 陈泽 CHAI Rong;CHEN Ze(School of Law,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China)

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学法学院,北京100875

出　　处：《河北大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2025年第1期44-52,共9页Journal of Hebei University(Philosophy and Social Science)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金一般项目“中国古代国家治理中的土地法经验研究”(21BFX004)。

摘　　要：在重视法律的历史背景下,宋代形成了以“防止奸弊”为目的,以“听”“断”分离为形式的“鞫谳分司”制度。司法参军作为“谳司”官员,是宋代地方州一级的重要司法属官,主要负责对“检出”的量刑法条进行核定与“驳正”。出生于簪缨之家的毛滂,深受当时社会环境和家庭的影响,养成了较高的法律素养。分析毛滂在司法参军任上的“检法”实例,可以看出他在遵守法律的前提下,对“止杀”“仁民”“爱物”等司法活动多重价值的权衡取舍。结合具体的司法实践,可以更加深入地认识宋代重视法律的历史背景和“鞫谳分司”的运行机制,以及其与司法官员之间相互影响、相互作用的紧密关系。In the historical background of attaching importance to the law,the Song Dynasty formed the“Ju Yan Fen Si”system with the purpose of“preventing corruption”and the separation of“hearing”and“judgment”.Si Fa Can Jun was an important judicial official at the local state level in the Song Dynasty,mainly responsible for verifying the sentencing laws.Mao Pang,who was born in a family of scholars,was deeply influenced by the environment at that time and his family,and developed a high level of legal literacy.Analyzing Mao Pang's example of“prosecution and law enforcement”during his tenure as Si Fa Can Jun,it can be seen that he balanced the multiple values of judicial activities such as“stopping killings”,“benevolence to the people”,and“loving all creatures”while complying with the law.By combining specific judicial practices,we can have a deeper understanding of the historical background of the Song Dynasty's emphasis on the law and the operating mechanism of the“Ju Yan Fen Si”,as well as its close connection with the mutual influence and interaction between judicial officials.

关 键 词：重视法律 “鞫谳分司” 司法参军 改易风俗 

分 类 号：K244[历史地理—历史学]