检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈栋 Chen Dong
机构地区:[1]北京知识产权法院
出 处:《电子知识产权》2024年第10期92-109,共18页Electronics Intellectual Property
摘 要:人工智能和互联网时代,机器训练日益成为知识传播和交流的重要方式。语料是影响人工智能能力和水平的关键因素,作品是不可替代、高质量训练语料,但面临大量侵权指控和纠纷,缺乏针对性和明确的处理规则。机器训练过程中,复制行为是必要行为和争议焦点问题。当前TDM例外规则、合理使用规则、法定许可规则等难以妥善应对训练行为、对象和目的及后续行为的复杂性。本文源于训练成本高、纠纷多的现实问题,尝试以技术过程、创新激励和数据公平为视角,在比较相关规则适用性基础上,聚焦训练中的复制行为,主张按照被诉行为过程、作品类型、训练方式并结合后续行为进行分步骤、综合性评价。In the era of artificial intelligence and the Internet,machine training has increasingly become an important way of knowledge dissemination and exchange.Corpus is a key factor affecting the ability and level of artificial intelligence.Works are irreplaceable and high-quality training corpus,but they are faced with a large number of infringement allegations and disputes,and lack of targeted and clear handling rules.In the process of machine training,copying behavior is a necessary behavior and the focus of controversy.The current TDM exception rules,fair use rules and statutory licensing rules are difficult to properly cope with the complexity of training behavior,object and purpose and subsequent behavior.Due to the practical problems of high training cost and many disputes,this paper tries to focus on the replication behavior in training from the perspective of technical process,innovation incentive and data fairness,and on the basis of comparing the applicability of relevant rules,advocating a step-by-step and comprehensive evaluation according to the process of the accused behavior,the type of work and the training method combined with subsequent behaviors.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222