“整体观察、综合判断”原则的具体适用——以外观设计专利授权确权与侵权纠纷关联案件为视角  

Specifi c Application of the Principle of“Overall Observation and Comprehensive Judgment”:From the Perspective of Cases Relating to Design Patent Authorization and Infringement Disputes

作　　者：王延军 WANG Yanjun(Zhejiang Shuangshi Law Firm,Jinhua 321000,China)

机构地区：[1]浙江双实律师事务所,金华321000

出　　处：《专利代理》2024年第4期32-40,共9页Patent Agency

摘　　要：根据《最高人民法院关于审理侵犯专利权纠纷案件应用法律若干问题的解释(二)》第二十三条的规定,探讨以在后外观设计专利的专利权评价报告、意见陈述及专利无效宣告决定等法律文件进行抗辩该如何处理,并以外观设计专利授权确权与侵权纠纷关联案件为视角,从外观设计专利审查和侵权判断标准的历史源头出发,结合我国当下的外观设计侵权判断标准,厘清先后外观设计专利获得授权或确权后各自的专利保护范围,为外观设计专利的相似侵权判定提供实务操作思路,为律师代理外观设计专利授权确权和侵权纠纷案件扩展一个新的视角。This paper tries to explore how we can deal with the case if the accused infringer brings in legal documents such as patent evaluation report,opinion statement and invalidation decision over post-design patent right,etc.,according to Article 23 of“Interpretation of the Supreme People’s Court on Several Issues Relating to the Application of Patent Infringement Disputes(II)”.From the angle of the confirmation of design patent authorization and the dispute cases relating to infringement,this paper starts with the historical source of design patent examination and infringement judgment standards,and combines with the current design infringement judgment standards in practice in China,clarifies the respective protection scope of patents,prior to or after they are authorized and confi rmed,thus providing ideas for the practical handling of similar design patent infringement cases and a new perspective for lawyers in design patent authorization confi rmation or infringement dispute cases.

关 键 词：外观设计专利 一般消费者 原则适用 现有设计 

分 类 号：D923.42[政治法律—民商法学]