SEP权利要求对应性认定和撰写规则探讨  

Exploration of SEP Essentiality Assessment and Claim Drafting Rules

作　　者：李辉 LI Hui(Beijing Sanyou Intellectual Property Agency Ltd.,Beijing 100033,China)

机构地区：[1]北京三友知识产权代理有限公司,北京100033

出　　处：《专利代理》2024年第4期79-85,共7页Patent Agency

摘　　要：在标准必要专利(SEP)的权利行使过程中,首先需要对专利是否属于SEP,也就是专利与标准的对应性进行认定。通过梳理不同法域、标准组织、司法机构的相关实践和规则,给出了标准对应性判断的综合性判断方式。同时,基于标准产出和专利获权过程的变动性特点以及权利行使目的,建议在SEP专利的撰写过程中在字面对应的基础上进行拓展性的权利要求布局。In anticipation of enforcing a standard essential patent(SEP),it is fi rst necessary to make an essentiality assessment,i.e.to evaluate the correspondence between the patent and a standard.By examining the practices and rules of different jurisdictions,standard-setting organizations,and judicial institutions,this paper provides a comprehensive approach for essentiality assessment.Additionally,considering the variability characteristics of standard development and patent prosecution processes,as well as the goals of patent enforcement,it recommendes to expand the claim layout in the drafting of SEP patents beyond literal correspondence.

关 键 词：标准必要专利 权利要求对应性 标准对应性 

分 类 号：D920.4[政治法律—法学]