行政复议适当性审查适用场景的类型化  

Typology of Scenarios for Appropriateness Review of Administrative Reconsideration

作　　者：杜仪方[1] DU Yifang

机构地区：[1]复旦大学法学院,上海200433

出　　处：《上海交通大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2024年第12期54-65,共12页Journal of Shanghai Jiao tong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社科基金项目“突发事件应对下的行政征收征用及其权利救济研究”(20BFX047)。

摘　　要：不同于行政诉讼,行政复议制度中将适当性审查与合法性审查相并列。行政复议的适当性审查应指代结果的可接受性,涵盖当事人的个别认可和社会的普遍认同。行政复议的适当性审查至少包括三种场景,并分别采取不同审查路径。就羁束行政行为,复议机关应运用理性和程序就不确定法律概念作出解释和在个案中进行涵射;就裁量行政行为,复议机关首先需要判定裁量基准在个案中的可适用性,如果无裁量基准则分别区分专门技术性问题和一般问题;当适用规则会出现明显不当时,则复议机关应用适用原则突破规则以实现适当性。Unlike administrative litigation,the administrative reconsideration system involves both appropriateness review and legality review conducted in parallel.The appropriateness review in administrative reconsideration refers to the acceptability of outcomes,encompassing both individual recognition by the parties involved and general societal consensus.There are at least three scenarios in which the appropriateness review is applicable,each requiring different review pathways.For constrained administrative actions,the reconsideration authority should rationally and procedurally interpret ambiguous legal concepts,applying them appropriately to the specific cases at hand;for discretionary administrative actions,the reconsideration authority must first determine whether the discretion standards apply to the case at hand,distinguishing between specialized technical issues and general issues,particularly when no standards exist;when the application of rules results in manifestly inappropriate outcomes,the reconsideration authority should apply principles of appropriateness to transcend rigid rule application,ensuring that the outcome is acceptable.

关 键 词：行政复议 适当性审查 法律原则 合法性审查 可接受性 

分 类 号：D922.11[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]