学位授予行为的司法审查:性质、范围与强度——基于柴丽杰案的学术自治反思  

Judicial Review of Degree Conferment:Nature,Scope and Intensity—Reflections on Academic Autonomy Based on the Case of Chai Lijie

作　　者：湛中乐 宋依璠[3] Zhan Zhongle;Song Yifan

机构地区：[1]新疆大学 [2]北京大学法学院 [3]北京大学教育法研究中心

出　　处：《中国社会科学院大学学报》2024年第9期5-25,140,F0003,共23页Journal of University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences

摘　　要：在柴丽杰诉上海大学案中引发争议的学位授予标准制定权及学位评定权均属于学位授予权体系的组成部分,争议产生的根本原因在于高校自主权必须兼顾国家标准框架与学术共同体的专业理性。目前对高校规定合法性审查的司法实践侧重从国家法律法规层面寻求框架性规定和授权性依据,忽略了学位授予权作为“无法律保留”的宪法基本权利即学术自由与国家立法的关系,导致司法对学术性标准的审查逸脱实质性判断。作为宪法学术自由的载体,高校学位授予标准的司法审查标准应当从学术自由的目的和范畴出发,对学位授予标准要求学术论文发表的合法性进行审查。The controversies arising from the establishment of degree conferment standards and the rights to evaluate degrees in the case ofChai Lijie v.Shanghai Universityare both part of the degree conferment authority system.The fundamental reason lies in the need for universities'autonomy to balance national standard frameworks with the professional rationality of the academic community.Currently,the judicial practice of reviewing the legality of university regulations focuses on seeking framework regulations and authorization bases from national laws and regulations,while neglecting the relationship between the right to confer degrees,which is a fundamental constitutional right without legal reservation,namely academic freedom,and national legislation.This leads to judicial reviews deviating from substantial judgments on academic standards.As a carrier of constitutional academic freedom,the judicial review standards for university degree conferment should be based on the purpose and scope of academic freedom,examining the legality of requiring academic paper publication as part of degree conferment standards.

关 键 词：柴丽杰案 学位授予权 学术自由 学术论文发表 

分 类 号：D922.16[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]