当代隐喻学视域中认知辞格的归并研究  

A Study of the Merging of Cognitive Figures of Speech from the Perspective of Contemporary Metaphor

作　　者：陈曦[1] 王雁冰[1] CHEN Xi;WANG Yan-bing(School of Foreign languages,Shanxi Datong University,Datong Sahnxi,037009)

机构地区：[1]山西大同大学外国语学院,山西大同037009

出　　处：《山西大同大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第6期107-110,119,共5页Journal of Shanxi Datong University(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：2024年山西省高等学校教学改革创新项目(一般性项目)“应用型本科院校艺体专业大学英语‘EGP+ESP’课程设置与教学模式研究”(J20241173);2024年山西省社会科学界联合会(山西省外语教育与文化传播研究)专项课题“新时代背景下国际外语人才培养与评价标准研究”(WYYJZXKT2024023)。

摘　　要：深入剖析隐喻和转喻的内在逻辑关联,提炼出宏观描述意义构建的关键要素。隐喻和转喻须臾难离,共同支撑起认知辞格的理论框架;言过其实和低调陈述背道而驰,通过对标量值的调节实现特定的语义效果;反语看似自相矛盾,实则表达嘲讽语气;悖论和对顶移步换景,通过语义框架的重置实现语义适恰。剖析这些辞格的形式表达和语义内涵,阐述这些修辞格的内在性质和相互关联,总结概念表征和认知模型之间的对应方式,从而弥合非基本修辞格研究的不足,为构建统一的修辞语言研究框架提供一定的理论基础。This paper probes into the internal logical connection between metaphor and metonymy,and distills the key elements in the construction of macro-descriptive meaning.Metaphor and metonymy are interwoven with each other to jointly support the theoretical framework of cognitive rhetoric.Overstatement and understatement are literally opposed to each other,and they achieve specific semantic effects by adjusting scalar values.Irony seems to be contradictory,but it expresses a mocking tone.Paradox and Oxymoron change the scenery by resetting the semantic frame to achieve semantic appropriateness.By analyzing the forms and semantic connotations of these rhetorical devices,this paper elaborates on their inner nature and mutual relations,and summarizes the correspondence between conceptual representation and cognitive models,thus providing a theoretical basis for the construction of a unified framework for rhetorical language research by filling the gap in the study of non-basic figures of speech.

关 键 词：修辞语言研究框架 基本修辞格 非基本修辞格 

分 类 号：H051[语言文字—语言学]