国际智慧乡村发展中的国家作用机制实践与启示  

Practice and Enlightenment of the Mechanism for China in the Development of International Smart Villages

作　　者：许源源[1] 谭丰隆 XU Yuanyuan;TAN Fenglong(School of Public Administration,Central South University,Changsha 410075,Hunan,China)

机构地区：[1]中南大学公共管理学院,湖南长沙410075

出　　处：《经济地理》2024年第11期194-203,共10页Economic Geography

基　　金：湖南省社会科学成果评审委员会重点课题(XSP2023ZDI006);中南大学研究生科研创新项目(2022ZZTS0332)。

摘　　要：智慧乡村是数字化背景下整体性的乡村发展战略,相关国际经验对中国乡村的建设具有借鉴作用。文章以多个国家和地区的智慧乡村发展案例为基础,对智慧乡村发展中的国家作用进行总结分析。研究表明,主要存在两种类型的国家作用,一方面是国家的“总领性”作用,特征为自上而下的行政整合,另一方面是国家的“中介性”作用,特征为自下而上的集体参与。导致国家作用存在差异的因素,主要是国家的经济发展水平与社会力量。总体来看,“总领性”或“中介性”作用均具有一定的优势性与局限性,因此,为实现中国数字乡村的高质量发展,要在完善“总领性”作用的基础上,提升“中介性”作用,致力于构建两者并存的复合体系。Smart village is a holistic rural development strategy under the background of digitalization.Relevant international experience can be used as a reference for the construction of rural areas in China.Based on the development cases of smart villages in many countries and regions,this paper summarizes and analyzes the role of the country in the development of smart villages.Studies have shown that there are two main types of country roles.On the one hand,the country's"overarching"role is characterized by top-down administrative integration;on the other hand,the country's"intermediary"role is characterized by bottom-up collective participation.The factors that lead to differences in the role of the country are mainly the level of economic development and social strength of country.Overall,the role of"overarching"or"intermediary"has certain advantages and limitations.Therefore,in order to realize the high-quality development of China's digital villages,it is necessary to improve the role of"intermediary"and devote ourselves to building a composite system where the two coexist.

关 键 词：智慧乡村 国家作用 总领性 中介性 乡村发展 数字乡村 

分 类 号：F323[经济管理—产业经济] F49