检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈罗炜 CHEN Luowei
机构地区:[1]中南财经政法大学财政税务学院,湖北武汉430073
出 处:《保险职业学院学报》2024年第5期11-17,共7页Journal of Insurance Professional College
摘 要:本文通过明确分档筹资模式,梳理各地分档筹资政策,分析了分档筹资对居民医保参保负担及基金可持续性的影响。研究发现:按待遇分档未减轻参保负担,按年龄分档一定程度减轻了参保负担,分档筹资对促进医保基金收支平衡的效果有限,对分档筹资模式认知不清、分档筹资与中央政策衔接不畅、分档筹资功能定位模糊错位是影响分档筹资实施效果的主要原因,据此提出明确分档筹资概念及作用、做好分档筹资与其他政策措施配套衔接、因地制宜发挥不同分档筹资模式作用的政策建议。This paper analyzes the effects of graded financing on the burden of participation and fund sustainability of residents’health insurance by clarifying the graded financing model and sorting out the graded financing policies in different regions.The study finds that the tiering by treatment does not reduce the burden of participation,the tiering by age reduces the burden of participation to a certain extent,and the effect of tiering on promoting the balance of income and expenditure of the health insurance fund is limited.The main reasons for the impact on the effectiveness of the implementation of the graded financing model are unclear understanding of the model,poor articulation between the graded financing and the centralized policy,and ambiguous and misplaced positioning of the functions of the graded financing.Accordingly,policy recommendations are put forward for clarifying the conceptual role of the graded financing,making good progress in the articulation between the graded financing and other policy measures,and giving full play to the functions of the different graded financing models in accordance with the local conditions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.185