检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄蔚 HUANG Wei(Law Institution of Sichuan Academy of Social Sciences,Chengdu Sichuan 610000,China)
机构地区:[1]四川省社会科学院法学所,四川成都610000
出 处:《四川文理学院学报》2025年第1期66-72,共7页Sichuan University of Arts and Science Journal
摘 要:董事对第三人承担责任是基于董事对第三人的信义义务,公司运营状态、董事身份和第三人类型,均对董事所需要承担的义务程度产生影响。司法实践中董事实施不当行为之后的归责原则和举证责任分配等方面有不同的学说理论。通过线上案例库下载的十余份关于董事义务的案例进行研究,分析董事违反信义义务后的相关责任承担,讨论公司董事应当在何种情形下承担董事信义义务,以及对信义义务的构成要件、责任类型和追责机制进行探析,提出了商业判断规则、公司决议和董事责任保险三种方式对公司治理进行优化。The responsibility of directors towards third parties is based on their fiduciary obligations towards third parties.The operational status of the company,the identity of directors,and the type of third party all have an impact on the degree of obligations that directors need to undertake.There are different theoretical theories regarding the attribution principle and allocation of burden of proof for improper behavior committed by directors in judicial practice.By download-ing more than ten cases on director obligations from an online case library,this study analyzes the relevant responsibilities of directors who violate fiduciary duties,discusses under what circumstances company directors should assume director fi-duciary duties,and explores the constituent elements,types of responsibilities,and accountability mechanisms of fiduciary duties.Three ways are proposed to optimize corporate governance:business judgment rules,company resolutions,and di-rector liability insurance.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49