非法获取商业秘密入罪标准问题刍议  

Discussion on the Problems of Incrimination Standard in Trade Secret's Illegal Acquisition

作　　者：张彬 葛捷平 Zhang Bin;Ge Jieping

机构地区：[1]深圳市罗湖区人民检察院,广东深圳518003

出　　处：《南海法学》2024年第6期56-66,共11页The South China Sea Law Journal

摘　　要：新质生产力的发展对商业秘密保护提出了更高要求。长期以来,囿于模糊不清、落后于实际的入罪标准,非法获取型侵犯商业秘密罪在司法实践中一直未能引起重视,但出于严格保护商业秘密的考量,有必要对其入罪标准作与时俱进的重构。当前“合理许可使用费”“销售利润的损失”“商业秘密的商业价值”这三种主要的数额标准均存在应用场景错位问题。从非法获取的意涵出发,本罪的获取型构成要件行为应具备图利加害目的要素,且其外延“其他不正当手段”应及至重制和第三手获取行为。此基础上,需要根据获取行为的类型及商业秘密的状态,结合未来新司法解释的非数额标准,重新排布现行数额标准的适用范围,构建起数额标准与非数额标准并重的新型入罪标准。The development of new quality productive forces puts forward higher requirements for the protection of trade secrets.For a long time,due to the ambiguity and backwardness of the incrimination standard,the crime of infringement of trade secrets constituted by illegal acquisition has not been paid attention to in judicial practice.However,due to the consideration of strict protection of trade secrets,it is necessary to reconstruct the incrimination standard of this crime with the times.At present,the three main amount standards of"reasonable license fee"and"loss of sales profit"and"commercial value of trade secrets"all have the problem of application scenario dislocation.Starting from the meaning of illegal acquisition,the tatbestand behaviors of this crime should have the purpose of profit or inflict,and its extension"other improper means"should include the reproduction behavior and third-hand acquisition.On this basis,it is necessary to take the non-amount standard in the new judicial interpretation in the future as a reference,rearrange the scope of application of the current amount standard according to the type of acquisition behavior and the state of trade secrets,and construct a new type of incrimination standard that pays equal attention to the amount standard and the non-amount standard.

关 键 词：非法获取行为 侵犯商业秘密罪 重大损失 情节严重 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]